Cybersecurity · Secure
We test your applications, networks and cloud estate against an agreed scope and written rules of engagement, combining tool-assisted discovery with hands-on exploitation by experienced testers. Each finding is reported with reproducible evidence, a severity rating, the business impact it carries and clear remediation guidance. We prioritise the issues an attacker would realistically reach first, so your team fixes what matters rather than working through an undifferentiated list. Once remediation is complete we retest to confirm the fixes hold.
In short
VAPT combines automated vulnerability assessment with manual penetration testing to show what an attacker could actually achieve. The assessment finds the broad set of known weaknesses, and the testing establishes which of them are genuinely exploitable in your environment and what an intruder could reach as a result.
Start a conversationWhat we do
We agree targets, timing windows, authorisation and escalation contacts in writing before any testing begins. This protects production, sets the boundaries for destructive testing, and ensures everyone who needs to know is informed. The signed document becomes the reference point for the whole engagement.
We identify known weaknesses across the in-scope estate using established tooling supported by manual verification. We then remove the false positives and low-value noise that automated scanners generate, so the findings carried forward are real. The result is a verified baseline rather than a raw scanner export.
We attempt realistic attack paths by hand, chaining individually minor issues into a route that reaches something that matters. This is where scanners fall short, because they test findings in isolation rather than as an attacker would combine them. We stop at the agreed objective and record exactly how each path was achieved.
We report each finding with reproducible steps, evidence and a severity that reflects its real impact in your environment. The report separates what must be fixed now from what can be scheduled, and carries an executive summary for decision-makers. After remediation we retest the affected findings and confirm in writing whether they are resolved.
What you receive
Documented output your teams keep and can act on without us in the room.
When this work helps
How an engagement runs
Understand what matters most, the obligations in play, and what the organisation is genuinely trying to protect. We agree scope and rules of engagement in writing here, so testing is bounded and authorised before it begins.
Test and review the systems in scope, and establish real exposure rather than theoretical risk. We gather evidence for every finding, so severity reflects what we demonstrated rather than what is merely conceivable.
Prioritise remediation, control improvements, and architecture changes against risk and effort. We sequence the work so the exposures that matter most are closed first, within what the team can realistically do.
Support remediation, retest what was fixed, and help the practice hold as the environment changes. We confirm fixes actually closed the issue, rather than taking remediation on trust.
Where we work
Fidova delivers cybersecurity consulting and technical assurance from Delhi, India, and works with clients internationally; testing and review are performed remotely against your environments, with on-site work arranged when scope requires it.
Engagements run in English, are scheduled around your time zone, and can be delivered remotely end to end, with on-site time planned where a phase genuinely benefits from being in the room.
Related services
Web application security testing examines authentication, authorisation, business logic and data handling in your web applications. It goes beyond common injection patterns to the authorisation boundaries and workflow logic where the most damaging flaws usually hide.
Mobile application security testing examines the app on the device, the traffic it sends, and the backend APIs it depends on. It covers what the app stores and leaks locally as well as the server-side weaknesses that sit behind it, because the most serious issues are usually in the backend rather than the binary.
API security testing examines authentication, authorisation, input handling and rate controls across your interfaces. It focuses on the authorisation and data-access failures that dominate real API incidents rather than only surface-level input flaws.
Questions
Straight answers to what buyers ask us before an engagement begins.
Enquiries
Your enquiry lands in the same inbox as every other on this site and is read by us. Tell us the requirement and we will reply with a practical next step.
Prefer email? contact@fidovaadvisory.com
Next step
